Talk:Schulze STV: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(Created page with "Schulze STV's party list case is not D'Hondt because Schulze STV passes the Droop proportionality criterion, which is quota-based. No divisor methods pass quota criteria, so S...") |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 10:41, 18 March 2020
Schulze STV's party list case is not D'Hondt because Schulze STV passes the Droop proportionality criterion, which is quota-based. No divisor methods pass quota criteria, so Schulze STV's party list case can't be any of them. Most likely, it is LR-Droop, but I haven't proven that. Kristomun (talk) 10:41, 18 March 2020 (UTC)