Talk:Spoiler effect: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(Make IRV better.) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
How do you mitigate the spoiler effect when the runner-up causes it? I offer an improved version of IRV, [[user:RalphInOttawa/Standard Vote]], that does not let spoilers ruin an election. Voters should never have to accept real life results like the 2009 Burlington Mayoral Election and the 2022 Alaska’s at-large congressional district special election. These results may not be grounds for legal challenges but they should be enough for governments to stop using voting systems that can do that to their voters |
How do you mitigate the spoiler effect in IRV when the runner-up causes it? I offer an improved version of IRV, [[user:RalphInOttawa/Standard Vote]], that does not let spoilers ruin an election. Voters should never have to accept real life results like the 2009 Burlington Mayoral Election and the 2022 Alaska’s at-large congressional district special election. These results may not be grounds for legal challenges but they should be enough for governments to stop using voting systems that can do that to their voters. |
||
[[User:RalphInOttawa|RalphInOttawa]] ([[User talk:RalphInOttawa|talk]]) 16:16, 13 January 2024 (UTC) |
[[User:RalphInOttawa|RalphInOttawa]] ([[User talk:RalphInOttawa|talk]]) 16:16, 13 January 2024 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 16:31, 13 January 2024
How do you mitigate the spoiler effect in IRV when the runner-up causes it? I offer an improved version of IRV, user:RalphInOttawa/Standard Vote, that does not let spoilers ruin an election. Voters should never have to accept real life results like the 2009 Burlington Mayoral Election and the 2022 Alaska’s at-large congressional district special election. These results may not be grounds for legal challenges but they should be enough for governments to stop using voting systems that can do that to their voters.
RalphInOttawa (talk) 16:16, 13 January 2024 (UTC)