Cardinal voting systems: Revision history

(If this page was imported from wiki.electorama.com, you can also find the original revision history there.)

Diff selection: Mark the radio boxes of the revisions to compare and hit enter or the button at the bottom.
Legend: (cur) = difference with latest revision, (prev) = difference with preceding revision, m = minor edit.

5 June 2023

28 April 2022

27 April 2022

  • curprev 09:4909:49, 27 April 2022Kristomun talk contribs 22,670 bytes +855 Remove sentence part that needed a citation since none has been given since March. Correct Gibbard-Satterthwaite (should be Gibbard) and add some info about nondeterministic methods

23 March 2022

16 May 2021

20 April 2021

22 December 2020

25 July 2020

7 July 2020

26 May 2020

14 May 2020

11 May 2020

27 April 2020

23 April 2020

21 April 2020

12 April 2020

3 April 2020

23 March 2020

20 March 2020

17 March 2020

16 March 2020

15 March 2020

3 March 2020

17 February 2020

9 February 2020

27 January 2020

  • curprev 06:5406:54, 27 January 2020BetterVotingAdvocacy talk contribs 11,935 bytes +291 I'd like to explain my edit of "Cardinal voting maximizes the number of people who vote for a candidate to become the representative. This is expected to have a knock-on effect of better acceptance of results and higher voter turnout."; as an example, if you have 51 A5 B1 and 49 B1, then technically B is the candidate most voters voted for, yet A wins. So I've modified that part to be a claim. Tag: Visual edit

28 December 2019

15 December 2019

14 December 2019

7 December 2019

5 December 2019

28 November 2019

17 September 2019

9 February 2019

10 November 2018

2 September 2018

18 June 2013

  • curprev 16:3916:39, 18 June 2013imported>Homunq 416 bytes +416 Created page with "Cardinal voting systems, aka evaluative, rated, graded, or absolute systems, are ones in which the voter can evaluate each candidate independently on the same scale. Unlike ra..."