Information for "Draft talk:Cloaked Participation"

Basic information

Display titleDraft talk:Cloaked Participation
Default sort keyCloaked Participation
Page length (in bytes)887
Namespace ID3003
Page ID3301
Page content languageen - English
Page content modelwikitext
Indexing by robotsAllowed
Number of redirects to this page1

Page protection

EditAllow all users (infinite)
MoveAllow all users (infinite)
DeleteAllow all users (infinite)
View the protection log for this page.

Edit history

Page creatorKristomun (talk | contribs)
Date of page creation13:05, 25 March 2022
Latest editorRobLa (talk | contribs)
Date of latest edit06:12, 26 March 2022
Total number of edits4
Recent number of edits (within past 180 days)0
Recent number of distinct authors0

SEO properties



Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements.
I was wondering if perhaps this page should be removed. I've searched all the posts on EM for "cloaked participation", "acpc", "pcpc" and couldn't find any posts with either of these terms. In addition, there are no known methods that fail ordinary participation but pass these, at least not from the examples given on this page. So about the only thing it says is that certain methods pass even a weakening of Participation. I could write a page about mono-add-plump and add those results to a generalization/notes section to preserve them, in that case. Any thoughts? User:RobLa, User:Dr. Edmonds? Kristomun (talk) 13:05, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
Information from Extension:WikiSEO