4,207
edits
House monotonicity criterion: Difference between revisions
Adding {{merge from}} template links for Alabama paradox and Median Ratings, per the anonymous suggestions (Special:Contributions/2A02:2F0E:605:8400:75BA:97E2:41E3:5F75))
(Undo revision 9155 by Dr. Edmonds (talk)) Tag: Undo |
(Adding {{merge from}} template links for Alabama paradox and Median Ratings, per the anonymous suggestions (Special:Contributions/2A02:2F0E:605:8400:75BA:97E2:41E3:5F75))) |
||
Line 1:
{{merge from|Alabama paradox|discuss=Talk:Alabama paradox}}
{{merge from|Median Ratings|discuss=Talk:Median Ratings}}
The '''House monotonicity criterion''' is a criterion for apportionment/party list methods, and by extension, for multi-member methods in general. The term was first used by Balinski and Young in 1974.<ref name="Balinski Young pp. 4602–4606">{{cite journal | last=Balinski | first=M. L. | last2=Young | first2=H. P. | title=A New Method for Congressional Apportionment | journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences | publisher=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences | volume=71 | issue=11 | date=1974-11-01 | issn=0027-8424 | doi=10.1073/pnas.71.11.4602 | pages=4602–4606}}</ref>
| |||