Jump to content

Spatial models of voting: Difference between revisions

m
Fixed reference overlap error
(Fixing lede to match new title of the article (Spatial models of voting))
m (Fixed reference overlap error)
 
Line 68:
Political opinion can be divided into essentially any number of dimensions. Some other examples include the 3-dimensional [https://sapplyvalues.github.io Sapply Compass], the 4-dimensional [https://8values.github.io/ 8values] space, and the [https://9axes.github.io/ 9Axes] space.
 
One study of German voters found that at least four dimensions were required to adequately represent all political parties.<ref name=":2german">{{Cite journal|last1=Alós-Ferrer|first1=Carlos|last2=Granić|first2=Đura-Georg|date=2015-09-01|title=Political space representations with approval data|url=http://repub.eur.nl/pub/111247|journal=Electoral Studies|volume=39|pages=56–71|doi=10.1016/j.electstud.2015.04.003|quote=The analysis reveals that the underlying political landscapes ... are inherently multidimensional and cannot be reduced to a single left-right dimension, or even to a two-dimensional space. ... From this representation, lower-dimensional projections can be considered which help with the visualization of the political space as resulting from an aggregation of voters' preferences. ... Even though the method aims to obtain a representation with as few dimensions as possible, we still obtain representations with four dimensions or more.|hdl=1765/111247}}</ref>
 
There has been references to many other political compasses that are similar, orthogonal or even contradictive.
1,215

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.