Jump to content

Sainte-Laguë method: Difference between revisions

Improve reference
No edit summary
(Improve reference)
Line 12:
 
== Notes ==
Webster, unlike D'Hondt, doesn't guarantee that a majority of voters will get at least half of the seats.<ref name="Miller pp. 4–25">{{Citecite webjournal | last=Miller | first=Nicholas R. | title=Election Inversions under Proportional Representation | journal=Scandinavian Political Studies | publisher=Wiley | volume=38 | issue=1 | date=2014-12-05 | issn=0080-6757 | doi=10.1111/1467-9477.12038 | pages=4–25|url=https://userpages.umbc.edu/~nmiller/RESEARCH/NRMILLER.PCS2013.pdf|titleaccess-date=ELECTION INVERSIONS2020-03-24}}</ref>
UNDER PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION|last=|first=|date=|website=|page=16|url-status=live|archive-url=|archive-date=|access-date=}}</ref>
{| class="wikitable"
|+35-seat example
Line 62 ⟶ 61:
|}
If D'Hondt had been used, the final divisor would've been 27.944, with (results calculated by rounding down to the nearest number) Party A getting 18 seats out of 35, a 51.42% majority (503/27.944), B 10 seats (304/27.944), and C 6 seats.
 
== References ==
<references />
 
[[Category:Party list theory]]
1,215

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.