Information for "Talk:Majority Judgment"

Basic information

Display titleTalk:Majority Judgment
Default sort keyMajority Judgment
Page length (in bytes)495
Namespace ID1
NamespaceTalk
Page ID1946
Page content languageen - English
Page content modelwikitext
Indexing by robotsAllowed
Number of redirects to this page0
Number of subpages of this page0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects)

Page protection

EditAllow all users (infinite)
MoveAllow all users (infinite)
DeleteAllow all users (infinite)
View the protection log for this page.

Edit history

Page creatorBetterVotingAdvocacy (talk | contribs)
Date of page creation18:41, 18 March 2020
Latest editorBetterVotingAdvocacy (talk | contribs)
Date of latest edit18:41, 18 March 2020
Total number of edits1
Recent number of edits (within past 180 days)0
Recent number of distinct authors0

SEO properties

Description

Content

Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements.
The article says that MJ passes the mutual majority criterion, but then also says it fails the regular majority criterion. Either it must be talking about some other mutual majority criterion (my guess is that it may mean a mutual majority will win if they perfectly score all of their preferred candidates and don't perfectly score anyone else), or it does satisfy majority. BetterVotingAdvocacy (talk) 18:41, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Information from Extension:WikiSEO