Talk:Voting links: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
Psephomancy (talk | contribs) (Created page with "User:RobLa I actually wanted to eventually go through the "Websites" section and move all those links under more descriptive headings because "Websites" is so vague of a c...") |
(→Websites: - responding to User:Psephomancy about my split of Websites page) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Websites == |
|||
[[User:RobLa]] I actually wanted to eventually go through the "Websites" section and move all those links under more descriptive headings because "Websites" is so vague of a category. — [[User:Psephomancy|Psephomancy]] ([[User talk:Psephomancy|talk]]) 01:52, 18 April 2020 (UTC) |
[[User:RobLa]] I actually wanted to eventually go through the "Websites" section and move all those links under more descriptive headings because "Websites" is so vague of a category. — [[User:Psephomancy|Psephomancy]] ([[User talk:Psephomancy|talk]]) 01:52, 18 April 2020 (UTC) |
||
:Hmm....I agree with you that "Website" is a vague category name (and "Web page" is even worse). But I think we're going to have to endure some vagueness until someone proposes a better taxonomy for the links in that section. I just noticed that Wikipedia uses "[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Websites Category:Websites]", and then the categories below are not "[[w:MECE|MECE]]" (mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive). I have more ideas, but just ping me in one of the usual spots (e.g. on CES's [[Discord]] server) and we can sort things out. -- [[User:RobLa|RobLa]] ([[User talk:RobLa|talk]]) 02:13, 18 April 2020 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 02:13, 18 April 2020
Websites
User:RobLa I actually wanted to eventually go through the "Websites" section and move all those links under more descriptive headings because "Websites" is so vague of a category. — Psephomancy (talk) 01:52, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Hmm....I agree with you that "Website" is a vague category name (and "Web page" is even worse). But I think we're going to have to endure some vagueness until someone proposes a better taxonomy for the links in that section. I just noticed that Wikipedia uses "Category:Websites", and then the categories below are not "MECE" (mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive). I have more ideas, but just ping me in one of the usual spots (e.g. on CES's Discord server) and we can sort things out. -- RobLa (talk) 02:13, 18 April 2020 (UTC)