4,236
edits
Talk:Condorcet-IRV hybrid methods: Difference between revisions
Talk:Condorcet-IRV hybrid methods (view source)
Revision as of 20:44, 25 October 2023
, 8 months agoReformatting page for discussions, and replied to User:RalphInOttawa
(Created page with "I agree with the election of B in the example given. I have "made" a google spreasheet which uses an IRV-Condorcet'ish process which creates a three way tie when the A>B votes change to A. If the 49 A>B voters really don't want C, they have little motivation to risk a 1 in 3 chance of electing someone they don't want over the two they do.") |
(Reformatting page for discussions, and replied to User:RalphInOttawa) |
||
Line 1:
This is the discussion page (the "Talk:" page) for the page named "[[{{BASEPAGENAME}}]]". Please use this page to discuss the topic described in the corresponding page in the main namespace (i.e. the "[[{{BASEPAGENAME}}]]" page here on electowiki), or visit [[Help:Talk]] to learn more about talk pages.
I agree with the election of B in the example given. I have "made" a google spreasheet which uses an IRV-Condorcet'ish process which creates a three way tie when the A>B votes change to A. If the 49 A>B voters really don't want C, they have little motivation to risk a 1 in 3 chance of electing someone they don't want over the two they do.▼
== Examples ==
▲I agree with the election of B in the example given. I have "made" a google spreasheet which uses an IRV-Condorcet'ish process which creates a three way tie when the A>B votes change to A. If the 49 A>B voters really don't want C, they have little motivation to risk a 1 in 3 chance of electing someone they don't want over the two they do. -- {{unsigned|RalphInOttawa}}
:Thanks for noting this, [[User:RalphInOttawa]]. Do you have a public link to the spreadsheet you created? -- [[User:RobLa|RobLa]] ([[User talk:RobLa|talk]]) 20:44, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
| |||