Talk:Voting links: Difference between revisions

From electowiki
Content added Content deleted
(Created page with "User:RobLa I actually wanted to eventually go through the "Websites" section and move all those links under more descriptive headings because "Websites" is so vague of a c...")
 
(→‎Shuffling: laying out my plan for shuffling the Voting links, scattering the links all over electowiki)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
This is the discussion page (the "Talk:" page) for the page named "[[{{BASEPAGENAME}}]]". Please use this page to discuss the topic described in the corresponding page in the main namespace (i.e. the "[[{{BASEPAGENAME}}]]" page here on electowiki), or visit [[Help:Talk]] to learn more about talk pages.


== Websites ==
[[User:RobLa]] I actually wanted to eventually go through the "Websites" section and move all those links under more descriptive headings because "Websites" is so vague of a category. — [[User:Psephomancy|Psephomancy]] ([[User talk:Psephomancy|talk]]) 01:52, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
[[User:RobLa]] I actually wanted to eventually go through the "Websites" section and move all those links under more descriptive headings because "Websites" is so vague of a category. — [[User:Psephomancy|Psephomancy]] ([[User talk:Psephomancy|talk]]) 01:52, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

:Hmm....I agree with you that "Website" is a vague category name (and "Web page" is even worse). But I think we're going to have to endure some vagueness until someone proposes a better taxonomy for the links in that section. I just noticed that Wikipedia uses "[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Websites Category:Websites]", and then the categories below are not "[[w:MECE|MECE]]" (mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive). I have more ideas, but just ping me in one of the usual spots (e.g. on CES's [[Discord]] server) and we can sort things out. -- [[User:RobLa|RobLa]] ([[User talk:RobLa|talk]]) 02:13, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

== Shuffling ==

It seems to me that this page is long overdue for splitting up into several pages and better organization. {{ping|Psephomancy}} had planned to do some more work on this page a couple of years ago, which I may have been guilty of discouraging. Here's a closer look at some of the incremental things that need to occur:

* Rename "[[Voting links#Websites]]" section title of the "Voting links" article to a new section title: "[[Voting links#Links|#Links]]"
* Move the links from the "[[Voting links#Discussion groups]]" to the "[[Forum]]" article
* Move the links from the "[[Voting links#Polling sites]]" section to the existing "[[Online poll]]" article
* Move the links from the "[[Voting links#Software]]" section to the existing "[[Software]]" article
* Create an [[election data]] page from the "[[Voting links#Election data]]" section

I may start doing that soon, barring objections from others. -- [[User:RobLa|RobLa]] ([[User talk:RobLa|talk]]) 00:00, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 00:00, 12 May 2022

This is the discussion page (the "Talk:" page) for the page named "Voting links". Please use this page to discuss the topic described in the corresponding page in the main namespace (i.e. the "Voting links" page here on electowiki), or visit Help:Talk to learn more about talk pages.


Websites

User:RobLa I actually wanted to eventually go through the "Websites" section and move all those links under more descriptive headings because "Websites" is so vague of a category. — Psephomancy (talk) 01:52, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Hmm....I agree with you that "Website" is a vague category name (and "Web page" is even worse). But I think we're going to have to endure some vagueness until someone proposes a better taxonomy for the links in that section. I just noticed that Wikipedia uses "Category:Websites", and then the categories below are not "MECE" (mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive). I have more ideas, but just ping me in one of the usual spots (e.g. on CES's Discord server) and we can sort things out. -- RobLa (talk) 02:13, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Shuffling

It seems to me that this page is long overdue for splitting up into several pages and better organization. @Psephomancy: had planned to do some more work on this page a couple of years ago, which I may have been guilty of discouraging. Here's a closer look at some of the incremental things that need to occur:

I may start doing that soon, barring objections from others. -- RobLa (talk) 00:00, 12 May 2022 (UTC)