Talk:Voting theorist: Difference between revisions

From electowiki
Content added Content deleted
m (RobLa moved page Talk:Voting theorists to Talk:Voting theorist: Pages are singular, and categories are plural)
(→‎Potentials to add: - I'm fine with being more inclusive, but do we have an objective means of rejecting people from the list?)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{TalkPageIntro}}
=== Potentials to add ===
== Potentials to add ==


* [[Michel Balinski]]
* [[Michel Balinski]]
Line 25: Line 26:


:: I think it would be a good idea to add all the above. This is not a field with any way to accredit people so it may be best to list as many people as possible. Any thoughts, [[User:RobLa|RobLa]]? --[[User:Dr. Edmonds|Dr. Edmonds]] ([[User talk:Dr. Edmonds|talk]]) 18:48, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
:: I think it would be a good idea to add all the above. This is not a field with any way to accredit people so it may be best to list as many people as possible. Any thoughts, [[User:RobLa|RobLa]]? --[[User:Dr. Edmonds|Dr. Edmonds]] ([[User talk:Dr. Edmonds|talk]]) 18:48, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

::: I'm okay with being more generous than [[English Wikipedia]] when it comes to notability, and I'm okay with this list. As you might have seen, we didn't (yet) have a page for [[Kenneth Arrow]] before today. Now we do. I'm not sure how we qualify people to go on the list, other than "''this person seems to know what they are talking about''". Do we have an objective means of rejecting people from the list? -- [[User:RobLa|RobLa]] ([[User talk:RobLa|talk]])

Revision as of 07:00, 2 December 2021

This is the discussion page (the "Talk:" page) for the page named "Voting theorist". Please use this page to discuss the topic described in the corresponding page in the main namespace (i.e. the "Voting theorist" page here on electowiki), or visit Help:Talk to learn more about talk pages.

Potentials to add

--Dr. Edmonds (talk) 02:08, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

  • Nicolaus Tideman
  • Markus Schulze also for the Schulze method
  • Forest Simmons - agenda methods, impossibility proofs
  • James Green-Armytage - for susceptibility to strategic voting, in particular for Condorcet methods
  • Friedrich Pukelsheim - biproportional apportionment used in Switzerland
  • Thomas Wright Hill, Carl Andræ, Thomas Hare - single transferable vote
  • Ka-Ping Yee, Brian Olson
  • Myself?
Kristomun (talk) 10:47, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
I think it would be a good idea to add all the above. This is not a field with any way to accredit people so it may be best to list as many people as possible. Any thoughts, RobLa? --Dr. Edmonds (talk) 18:48, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
I'm okay with being more generous than English Wikipedia when it comes to notability, and I'm okay with this list. As you might have seen, we didn't (yet) have a page for Kenneth Arrow before today. Now we do. I'm not sure how we qualify people to go on the list, other than "this person seems to know what they are talking about". Do we have an objective means of rejecting people from the list? -- RobLa (talk)