User talk:Devoutmoderate: Difference between revisions

From electowiki
Content added Content deleted
(→‎Welcome: - welcome, User:Devoutmoderate! Please read User:RobLa/Welcome, and please keep contributing!)
 
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:


Anyway, if you haven't read "'''[[User:RobLa/Welcome]]'''" yet, please do. There's some important information for you in that welcome letter (especially about the "[[User:Devoutmoderate]]" page, which is currently empty). I hope you contribute to other electowiki articles, too! -- [[User:RobLa|RobLa]] ([[User talk:RobLa|talk]]) 21:06, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
Anyway, if you haven't read "'''[[User:RobLa/Welcome]]'''" yet, please do. There's some important information for you in that welcome letter (especially about the "[[User:Devoutmoderate]]" page, which is currently empty). I hope you contribute to other electowiki articles, too! -- [[User:RobLa|RobLa]] ([[User talk:RobLa|talk]]) 21:06, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
: {{reply|RobLa}} Thanks! Yeah, I was just reading up on it and I thought the article was a bit too effusive. The performance of this site needs work though, so I dunno if I'll contribute much as every click to edit or even view content takes a very long time. I mostly mess about on wikipedia, but this site seems to be top Google results for some election stuff, so figured I'd edit a bit here. It would be wonderful if one site or the other published a comprehensive analysis table of all systems, maybe I'll take that up. Ideally somebody could rank the importance of various criteria, and an election system could be chosen that way- very meta, right? :) --[[User:Devoutmoderate|Devoutmoderate]] ([[User talk:Devoutmoderate|talk]]) 21:23, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:23, 11 January 2022

This is the discussion page (the "Talk:" page) for the user named "User:Devoutmoderate". Please use this page to have conversations with User:Devoutmoderate, or visit Help:Talk to learn more about talk pages more generally.

Welcome

Welcome, User:Devoutmoderate! I noticed that you put a somewhat skeptical point of view on Benham's method, which is good. You made me realize that there'a lot of copyediting that needs to occur on that article to come up to English Wikipedia's standard for quality of prose (which we should strive for with all electowiki articles) as well as EPOV (which should be closer English Wikipedia's "NPOV" than electowiki articles typically have right now in early 2022).

Anyway, if you haven't read "User:RobLa/Welcome" yet, please do. There's some important information for you in that welcome letter (especially about the "User:Devoutmoderate" page, which is currently empty). I hope you contribute to other electowiki articles, too! -- RobLa (talk) 21:06, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Template:Reply Thanks! Yeah, I was just reading up on it and I thought the article was a bit too effusive. The performance of this site needs work though, so I dunno if I'll contribute much as every click to edit or even view content takes a very long time. I mostly mess about on wikipedia, but this site seems to be top Google results for some election stuff, so figured I'd edit a bit here. It would be wonderful if one site or the other published a comprehensive analysis table of all systems, maybe I'll take that up. Ideally somebody could rank the importance of various criteria, and an election system could be chosen that way- very meta, right? :) --Devoutmoderate (talk) 21:23, 11 January 2022 (UTC)